WOONMACHINE / Installation / 2010
LLAC: BELGIAN PAVILION VENICE / proposal for the Belgian Pavilion at the Venice Biennale / 2010
LLAC: JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER / Architecture competition / 2009
VIEWMASTER / Instalation-performance / 2007-2009
CUBE / temporary projection space on “Mont des Arts” Brussels / 2008
MULTIPLICATIONS 02 / Video-instalation at Netwerk, Aalst / 2007
BORDER SQUARE 02 / Instalation at Netwerk, Aalst / 2007
MULTIPLICATIONS 01 / Working period at Les Bains, Brussels / Video-Instalation / 2007
TSUNAMI MONUMENT / Monument for the victims of the tsunami / Architectural Competition / 2006
IMPOSSIBLE FIGURES / Scenography and Dramaturgy for a solo dance piece / 2006
ROOM WITH A VIEW / Installation in a private apartment on the 25th floor / 2005
MIRRORING THE CITY / Proposition for an urban installation / 2005
RE-AXIS / Installation at Kunsfort near Haarlem / 2005
BORDER SQUARE 01 / Story about a subversive monument / short story – graphics / 2004
MONUMENTS OF SUBVERSION / Notes on the border square story / 2004
EU is not USA / Essay on the inevitable unclarity of the European Union / 2003
MULTIPLE PORTRAITS / Portraits consisting of combined googled faces / presented as lightboxes / 2003
YEAGER AT FLIGHT / Essay on the impossibility of the nomadic position / 2001
In collaboration with David Helbich and Paul Craenen
When the Temporary Institute was founded on the 14th of October 2006, a question was raised: What kind of infrastructure would be most suitable for an institute that is by definition temporary? How would this infrastructure demarcate itself from, and still be within the pre-existing architecture of its host institution? Constituted of 127 lines, 255 hooks and 1800m of rope in PE-elastic, a GRID was conceived that divided the space of Nadine into the 152 rooms of The Temporary Institute. This massive undertaking resulted in a fragile but monumental form: a three dimensional sketch of an imaginary building. Seen as an interiorized building, the equal sized rooms of the Institute propose, impose and absorb different kinds of programs.
The spatialisation of the Institute took a clear position toward its initial subject matter: For an organization that would deal principally with movement, an architectural solution was proposed in which there is no circulation space but only room(s) - an architecture that is explicitly obstructive towards ‘free’ movement. In the same logic that the force of the wind is measured by how much resistance it offers, the GRID would try to understand the circulation of movement in a public space by opposing it.
www.nadine.be